Centre for Geo Political Studies

| Archive | Login  |



Making Sense of Pakistan’s Intelligence Tip-off to India
  |Monday, 21 March 2016 11:00|Security| Page Views : 769

  Intelligence inputs from Pakistan to India about a potential terror attack have attracted considerable attention in India’s press and generated optimism that the sharing of such information could create goodwill and lead to a gradual normalization of ties between the two countries. The Indian Express reported that Pakistan’s National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. Naseer Janjua alerted his Indian counterpart, Ajit Doval, about a possible “26/11-style fidayeen assault on religious sites and processions in Gujarat” during a Hindu festival.

Days later, Pakistan’s interior minister, Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, confirmed that his government had indeed shared information with India about the entry of “at least 10 men within Indian territory from Pakistan.” In response, India rushed four teams from its special forces National Security Guard to the state of Gujarat to strengthen security cover at key installations and pilgrimage centers in the state. Security was also beefed up in New Delhi’s crowded markets and popular temples.

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has long been a vocal champion of better ties with India, but has had little by way of demonstrable action to show for it in the three terms that he has served as Pakistan’s prime minister. His first term in office coincided with a significant ramping up of the Pakistan-sponsored insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir, while his second term saw him having to contend with the fallout of a war with India in Kargil.

A popular view exists in Pakistan that while the country’s civilian leaders are keen to improve relations with India, Pakistan’s powerful army continues to view India as an existential threat and exercises its veto to put paid to attempts at rapprochement.

But if the recent inputs do turn out to be credible, it could suggest that there are signs of a nascent consensus in Pakistan between the civilian administration and the army on constructive engagement with India. Indeed, intelligence sharing between India and Pakistan is not without precedent. In 2004, India’s intelligence agencies reportedly tipped off their Pakistani counterparts about a potential attack on then President Pervez Musharraf by jihadi groups in Pakistan, during a rare period of thaw in bilateral ties.

However, there is justifiable cause for skepticism regarding the notion that India-Pakistan ties are headed for a turnaround or that Pakistan is finally shedding its historical reliance on terrorist groups to further its national security objectives.

Indeed, the circumstances surrounding the intelligence tip-off are curious. If Pakistan’s intelligence agencies did indeed have prior knowledge of the movement of these 10 individuals, it is not clear why no action was taken by Pakistani law enforcement officials while these individuals were still in Pakistani territory. Further, if the objective of the intelligence sharing was to “preempt a potential crisis in bilateral relations, even war,” the inputs doesn’t appear to have been particularly useful or actionable.

A source speaking to the Indian Express claimed that the warning did not contain “information that could lead the police to perpetrators…” Indeed, subsequent news reports appeared to cast doubts over whether the intended target of the perpetrators was the Indian state of Gujarat or the village of Gujrat near Pathankot, in the state of Punjab.

A third aspect pertains to the report that these ten individuals were “fidayeen from Lashkar-e-Taiba [LeT] and Jaish-e-Muhammed [JeM] cadres.” It is not clear here whether the implication is that members of the two terrorist groups were operating in the same unit. Such a suggestion would stretch credulity because LeT and JeM hold divergent ideologies and objectives and aren’t particularly big fans of each other. Indeed, there is no known instance where the two groups have operated together in the recent past, although members of LeT participated in the Afghanistan jihad in the 1990s alongside members of what would later become JeM.

But more broadly, optimism in this instance appears misplaced when viewed in the context of Pakistan’s historic nurturing and support of militant groups to further national security objectives. Both Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed continue to operate in Pakistan with the support of Pakistan’s security establishment, albeit to differing degrees.

Despite recent attestations by the Pakistanis that they no longer distinguish between “good jihadis” and “bad jihadis,” no evidence exists to suggest that Pakistan no longer supports anti-India groups operating in its territory. It would therefore take a significant leap of faith to believe that Pakistan’s security establishment is now willing to rush to the aid of its adversary by turning on its own proxies.

In the aftermath of the January 2016 attacks at the Pathankot Air Base in India, much was made of Pakistan’s reaction, which many believed signaled its commitment to bring those responsible to justice. Authorities allegedly sealed the offices of Jaish-e-Mohammed, took down their website and newspaper, and took JeM leader Maulana Masood Azhar into “preventive custody.”

While Masood Azhar is reportedly in custody today, the scholar Ayesha Siddiqa questions the claim that JeM’s Usman-o-Ali headquarters in Bahawalpur has been shut down. And at the time of this writing, JeM’s website and newspaper are back online. We are thus back to square one on the Pathankot litmus test. The Indian government must, of course, uphold its duty to its citizens and follow through on any intelligence alerts on potential threats to national security. To the extent that inputs from Pakistan can help mitigate such threats, they are welcome. But to suggest that the recent intelligence tip-off indicates a change in Pakistan’s mindset or that it is a harbinger of peace between the two countries would be a significant stretch.

By Rohan Joshi






Most Popular In News
Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Holds Talks in Bangladesh Over Rohingya Crisis (60481)

ASEAN and the EEU: Close to Free Trade Zone? (1255)

Afghanistan Peace Process and its Implications to the Region (1120)

A New High for U.S.-China Military Ties (1004)

India Sends Stealth Warships to South China Sea (1388)

Al-Qaeda wants to execute Microsoft founder Bill Gates to 'damage US economy' (852)

Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta: rush for mega-mergers puts food security at risk (3489)

'No Rohingya': Behind the US Embassy Protest in Myanmar (1022)

Food security fears resurface in Asian as nations face rice shortage due to drought (47676)

GCC-US Summit: Obama’s Failed Trip To Saudi Arabia (687)

Dharamsala Conference: Message To China And Pakistan (765)

A Vision of Reform in Saudi Arabia (960)

The South China Sea: Vietnam's Limited Diplomatic Options (794)

In Ukraine, the Cycle of Uncertainty Churns On (916)

Pakistan's Army Seeks Greater Authority Over China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Administration (47639)

German far-right party to 'rebrand itself' as anti-Muslim (657)

Thailand’s Junta Digs In (764)

The world may have too much food (731)

After Lahore: The Truth About Terrorism and Pakistan (1259)

Seven projects around the world that protect soil (777)

Breaking the Silence: Indonesia Vs. China in the Natuna Islands (898)

Isis's backup plan to retreat to Libya is falling apart (792)

Why President Obama Won’t Meet With Fidel Castro (1269)

Making Sense of Pakistan’s Intelligence Tip-off to India (769)

Deterring China: US Army to Stockpile Equipment in Cambodia and Vietnam (2198)


Russia-China: The West’s Dual Challenge (829)

Why Sanctions Won’t Stop North Korea (5677)

The Pacific Nuclear Test Cases (715)

Japan’s Deadliest Sub to Join Australia’s Navy in Military Drill (669)

Will the US Station Long-Range Heavy Bombers in Australia? (755)

Technology can help resolve South Asia’s fishing wars (989)

Europe to become an energy battlefield between Russia and the US (868)

Philippines impounds N. Korean ship under UN sanctions (677)

How Israel Navigated through the Hurricane of the Syrian Civil War (731)

Russia and Turkey, on the slippery slope to direct confrontation (711)

Freshwater biodiversity has positive impact on global food security (2781)

The Syrian Cauldron Boils Over (893)

US-China Relations: In the Shadow of Conspiracy Theories (737)

The Islamic State Threat Is Real in Pakistan (2895)

Pentagon: Russia agreed not to strike US forces in Syria (687)

Egypt's 'Security Threat': Churches (879)

Improved irrigation backed to halve food gap (840)

Should Radical Islamists Be Segregated in Prison? (696)

World hunger: what are the most undernourished countries? (779)

Turkey and Saudi Arabia: to fight or to flight? (908)

International responses to ISIS (994)

Message to Putin as U.S. ups NATO ante in Eastern Europe (3323)

David Cameron scrambles to beef up puny EU deal (795)

Is India Prepared to Prevent Sea-Borne Terrorist Infiltration? (1021)

Pakistan Will Provide 'Special Force' to Defend Chinese Investments (708)

China Rejects Latest US FONOP in the South China Sea (783)

What Does 2016 Hold for China-US Relations in Cyberspace? (790)

Now our troops face being hounded in court by the TALIBAN: Iraq witch-hunt lawyers set sights on Afghan claims (788)

No Prosperity for Iran after Nuclear Deal (784)

Related Topics
© by 2015 www.cgpscolombo.com  | Home | Archives  |  Contact Us |