Centre for Geo Political Studies

| Archive | Login  |



Should Radical Islamists Be Segregated in Prison?
  |Tue, 16 February 2016 16:15|Political| Page Views : 625

  What to do with Islamist prisoners? Should they be segregated, in which case they may further radicalize each other; or diffused, in which case they may radicalize other prisoners, as happened with the Charlie Hebdo-Hyper Cacher jihadis? Currently, France and the United Kingdom are grappling with this issue.

France is in the process of segregating radicalized prisoners in dedicated prison blocks in five prisons around the country. Those eligible for segregation include mostly those convicted of terror offenses, but include other "selected" prisoners as well. The French prisons appear to have devised a detection tool measuring likelihood of radicalization, or perhaps, of committing jihadi violence. The article refers to a "'detection grid' assessing personality, background, and observed religious behavior." Unfortunately, no information is given about the data or methodology behind it. (By way of example, the Salient Factor Score used for measuring likelihood of recidivism by parole-eligible federal prisoners relies on data collected from 1,806 cases studies.)

By contrast, the UK prisons are reportedly considering segregating only those convicted of Islamist terror offenses. The UK has identified roughly 1,000 prisoners "at risk" of extremist radicalization. The article offers no information about the means by which the UK prisons have identified at-risk prisoners. The goal of segregating the convicts would be to protect the at-risk individuals. The article contains no information about whether segregating convicted terrorists would leave potential radicalizers, who have not themselves been convicted of terrorist crimes, among at-risk prisoners.

Unfortunately, neither prison system seems to have devised a credible de-radicalization program. Reportedly, the UK is currently trying to develop such a program. Concentrating radical prisoners makes it less likely de-radicalization would work.

It probably goes without saying that in seeking first to do no harm, to paraphrase the Hippocratic oath, prisons should not ask Islamist organizations to vet their Muslim chaplains, as the United States Bureau of Prisons has been doing.

One criticism: the article about the French scene continues to mouth the platitude that poverty causes radicalization. For example: "Many of France's Muslim prisoners are disadvantaged and disaffected young men from communities blighted by poverty and unemployment." Compare that to the conclusion of a New Yorker article on the subject from last summer: "the profiles of French jihadists don't track closely with class; many have come from bourgeois families."

by Johanna Markind






Most Popular In News
Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Holds Talks in Bangladesh Over Rohingya Crisis (58798)

ASEAN and the EEU: Close to Free Trade Zone? (730)

India Sends Stealth Warships to South China Sea (790)

Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta: rush for mega-mergers puts food security at risk (2966)

Food security fears resurface in Asian as nations face rice shortage due to drought (46468)

Pakistan's Army Seeks Greater Authority Over China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Administration (46473)

After Lahore: The Truth About Terrorism and Pakistan (1003)

Why President Obama Won’t Meet With Fidel Castro (970)

Deterring China: US Army to Stockpile Equipment in Cambodia and Vietnam (1717)

Why Sanctions Won’t Stop North Korea (2926)

Technology can help resolve South Asia’s fishing wars (719)

Freshwater biodiversity has positive impact on global food security (2614)

The Syrian Cauldron Boils Over (653)

The Islamic State Threat Is Real in Pakistan (2708)

International responses to ISIS (683)

Message to Putin as U.S. ups NATO ante in Eastern Europe (2968)

Is India Prepared to Prevent Sea-Borne Terrorist Infiltration? (655)

Related Topics
© by 2015 www.cgpscolombo.com  | Home | Archives  |  Contact Us |