Centre for Geo Political Studies

| Archive | Login  |

 

  | HOME | ARTICLES BY CGPS  |WEEKLY REVIEW | RESEARCH | VIDEOS | OPINION | MEMBERSHIP | ABOUT US|
 

Is India Prepared to Prevent Sea-Borne Terrorist Infiltration?
  |Wed, 10 February 2016 10:00|Security| Page Views : 882



  David Headley, Lashkar-e-Taiba’s American-born “scout” ahead of the devastating November 2008 terror attacks in Mumbai that claimed over 170 lives, testified before an Indian court on Monday via a video conference. Headley’s remarks before the court have received wide coverage in the international media and contained few surprising or new details.

Headley’s testimony included references to the involvement of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI) in helping the Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists infiltrate India to perpetrate the worst terror attack on Indian soil since the 2006 Mumbai train bombings.

In the investigation into the terror attacks, one of the major revelations was that the 10 terrorists had entered India not by land, but using inflatable speed boats by sea. The first Indians the attackers confronted weren’t Coast Guard or Navy, but gormless fisherman, perplexed by a group of 10 strange Urdu-speaking men who’d just arrived by sea. For the Indian Coast Guard, the events of November 2008 sparked an increased focus on coastal monitoring. The November 2008 attacks had shown that the sea remained a viable vector for terrorist entry into India.

Over the past year, attacks at Gurdaspur and Pathankot, in Punjab, have refocused attention on terrorists crossing the land border with Pakistan, but Headley’s testimony should be a reminder of the sea-based threat from Pakistan-based terror groups. Speaking to the court, Headley emphasized that the November 26, 2008 coastal arrival wasn’t the first attempt by the 10 attackers. In September 2008, Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives had made a failed attempt.

“The boat disintegrated. The men had life jackets on and came to shore. The weapons and explosives were lost in the ocean,” Headley said. While he wasn’t clear on the details of the second attempt, he said that it was made “a month or so later.” “I don’t know exactly where the boat started from, but probably outside Karachi,” he added.

The Indian Coast Guard is currently undergoing a fleet expansion, aiming to field an fleet of 150 ships and 100 twin-engine aircraft by 2020. At the time of the Mumbai attack, the Coast Guard fielded 65 ships. The Coast Guard crossed the 100 ship mark in 2014. In 2014, Indian Coast Guard Director General Anurag G. Thapliyal told reporters that “[the Mumbai attacks] brought in lot of self-awareness. Our coastline was generally considered to be secured. We never anticipated this kind of terror using the sea route. This also brought in awakening.”

Beyond the simple expansion of the fleet, the Indian Coast Guard has undertaken a range of practices since the Mumbai attack to make the detection and prevention of infiltration more feasible. For example, ordinary fishing boats are tagged and color-coded based on their place of origin. Identity cards have become mandatory for fisherman.

Finally, commercial vessels, including fishing boats, have been required to operate transponders (though full compliance is easier said than done). Organizationally, the Indian Coast Guard hasn’t been restructured to contain something like the United States Coast Guard’s Maritime Safety and Security Team, a counter-terrorism team put together after the September 11, 2001 attacks against New York City and Washington DC.

What’s worrisome is that even after the trauma of 2008, the Indian Coast Guard remains under-prepared to stave off a similar attempt at coastal infiltration. Some readers may recall an incident at the end of 2014, where the Coast Guard intercepted a Pakistani fishing boat thought to be carrying terrorists. The boat supposedly blew itself up, killing all four individuals on board. (Though off-the-cuff remarks by a senior Indian Coast Guard official suggest the boat may have been destroyed by Indian authorities.

Headley’s testimony before the Indian court happened to come shortly after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi spoke at India’s International Fleet Review, emphasizing the “threat of sea borne terror.” India thus recognizes the importance of securing the maritime vector for possible terrorist infiltration, but should bolster its Coast Guard to adequately perform the task. Headley’s testimony is an all-too-timely reminder of the sea-based terror threat.

By Ankit Panda


 Comments

 Comments

Name
Email
Comments

                                     

             

 
Most Popular In News
Fearured
Indonesia’s Foreign Minister Holds Talks in Bangladesh Over Rohingya Crisis (59385)

ASEAN and the EEU: Close to Free Trade Zone? (1041)

Afghanistan Peace Process and its Implications to the Region (887)

A New High for U.S.-China Military Ties (733)

India Sends Stealth Warships to South China Sea (1159)

Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta: rush for mega-mergers puts food security at risk (3273)

'No Rohingya': Behind the US Embassy Protest in Myanmar (903)

Food security fears resurface in Asian as nations face rice shortage due to drought (47339)

Dharamsala Conference: Message To China And Pakistan (684)

A Vision of Reform in Saudi Arabia (887)

The South China Sea: Vietnam's Limited Diplomatic Options (724)

In Ukraine, the Cycle of Uncertainty Churns On (853)

Pakistan's Army Seeks Greater Authority Over China-Pakistan Economic Corridor Administration (47287)

Thailand’s Junta Digs In (683)

The world may have too much food (671)

After Lahore: The Truth About Terrorism and Pakistan (1190)

Seven projects around the world that protect soil (729)

Breaking the Silence: Indonesia Vs. China in the Natuna Islands (778)

Isis's backup plan to retreat to Libya is falling apart (728)

Why President Obama Won’t Meet With Fidel Castro (1183)

Making Sense of Pakistan’s Intelligence Tip-off to India (697)

Deterring China: US Army to Stockpile Equipment in Cambodia and Vietnam (1959)

74 PERCENT OF POOR PEOPLE DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY LAND DEGRADATION (668)

Russia-China: The West’s Dual Challenge (732)

Why Sanctions Won’t Stop North Korea (3105)

Will the US Station Long-Range Heavy Bombers in Australia? (672)

Technology can help resolve South Asia’s fishing wars (905)

Europe to become an energy battlefield between Russia and the US (794)

How Israel Navigated through the Hurricane of the Syrian Civil War (668)

Freshwater biodiversity has positive impact on global food security (2726)

The Syrian Cauldron Boils Over (825)

US-China Relations: In the Shadow of Conspiracy Theories (668)

The Islamic State Threat Is Real in Pakistan (2822)

Egypt's 'Security Threat': Churches (807)

Improved irrigation backed to halve food gap (749)

World hunger: what are the most undernourished countries? (661)

Turkey and Saudi Arabia: to fight or to flight? (778)

International responses to ISIS (880)

Message to Putin as U.S. ups NATO ante in Eastern Europe (3130)

David Cameron scrambles to beef up puny EU deal (680)

Is India Prepared to Prevent Sea-Borne Terrorist Infiltration? (882)

China Rejects Latest US FONOP in the South China Sea (667)

What Does 2016 Hold for China-US Relations in Cyberspace? (679)

Now our troops face being hounded in court by the TALIBAN: Iraq witch-hunt lawyers set sights on Afghan claims (682)

No Prosperity for Iran after Nuclear Deal (691)

Related Topics
.....
 
© by 2015 www.cgpscolombo.com  | Home | Archives  |  Contact Us |